The content exhibited try collected for the framework away from larger lookup tactics, and that consisted of reveal sociodemographic and you will relationship investigations, and also other bills in extent from romantic relationships
With respect to the full lifetime of the connection, the common, in years, into some other statuses described was, respectively: dos.89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = dos.97), one another communities differing between six months and you may eleven numerous years of matchmaking; 7.76 (SD = cuatro.01), ranging from two and you can 19 ages; and you can (SD = 4.82), ranging from below a-year and you will 30 many years. 8%) and you will stayed that have family unit members, while men and women living with the people were mainly doing work anybody (69.2%), from which 53% got college or postgraduate stages. Of your own certified commitment professionals, 67% got college otherwise article-graduate amount, where 89.8% was basically working, 2% retired and you can 8.2% unemployed. The functional problem towards the married participants are similar: 89.5% was doing work, 2.9% had been resigned and you can 6.3% have been unemployed, and you will step one.3% called other work status. In this group, 62.5% of users got college or university otherwise postgraduate degrees.
Private relationship is evaluated with respect to the Portuguese type (Table step 1) of your own less kind of the fresh new Hard work Scale (Stanley, 1986), which was translated with regards to the pursuing the translation and you may retroversion actions: shortly after consent got by the creator, the initial scale is translated of the two specialists in the field, both these translations was indeed subjected to retroversion because of the two experts, you to definitely bilingual and one experienced in the usage the fresh English language; fundamentally, for each type was than the completely new scale, choosing the aid of brand new terms and you may products with better proximity so you can it. The new Portuguese type ergo contained the new 14 new items and you can the same address measure and you can is entitled, after deliberation because of the party, the non-public Relationship Level (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Toward final stage of your interpretation process, brand new software try given to three users with the aim of guaranteeing the newest adequateness of vocabulary additionally the unambiguous comprehension of the items, which were chatted about with the users after application of the fresh new questionnaire. As there have been no statements claiming if not, those things stayed an equivalent.
As a consequence of a change of one’s totally new Davis (1996, cited inside Lind, 2008) scale, that it device is meant to size dating high quality feeling, with the hope you to, depending on the theoretical assumptions, each other balances usually certainly associate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a https://datingranking.net/xdating-review/ total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.